Gloucester Union v Woolwich Union
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1917 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Mullins v Harnett
... 1971 IR 42 DPP V KAVANAGH UNREP BARR 29.10.1997 NON-FATAL OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON ACT 1997 S28 GLOUCESTER UNION V WOOLWICH UNION 1917 2 KB 374 AG V MARQUESS OF HARTFORD 1849 3 EX 670 HITCHCOCK V WAY 1837 6 AD & EL 973 MCLOUGHLINS APPLICATION, IN RE 1963 IR 465 O'LEARY, R V JUSTICES OF......
-
Quinlivan v Governor of Portlaoise Prison
...Ltd. v. Attorney General [1970] I.R. 317. Eccles v. Ireland [1985] I.R. 545; [1986] I.L.R.M. 343. Gloucester Union v. Woolwich Union [1917] 2 K.B. 374. Hamilton v. Hamilton [1982] I.R. 466; [1982] I.L.R.M. 290. Hegarty v. O'Loughran [1990] 1 I.R. 148; [1987] I.R. 135, H.C.; [1990] I.L.R.M. ......
-
Grape Bay Ltd v Attorney General, 1997 Civil Jur. No.273
...52 Township of Nepean v LiekenUNK (1971) 16 DLR (3d) 113 Allhusen v BrookingELR [1884] 26 Ch.D. 559 Gloucester Union v Woolwich UnionELR [1917] 2 KB 374 West v GwynneELR [1911] 2 Ch.D.1 Spooner Oils Ltd. v Turner Valley Gas Conservation Board [1933] SCR 629 Prohibited Restaurant Act 1997 s.......
-
53 NLR 385
...construed to have a greater retrospective operation than its language renders strictly necessary. Gloucester Union v. Woolwich Union1[(1917) 2 K. B. 374]. Even, therefore, if the amendment to section 19 could properly have been regarded as declaratory and retrospective, it would not have fo......
Request a trial to view additional results