Goddard & Smith v Frew

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1939
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • Astrazeneca Insurance Company Ltd v XL Insurance (Bermuda) Ltd and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 28 Febrero 2013
    ...a loss and the question would then arise what was the cause of the loss. If the proximate cause (this seems to be the test; Goddard and Smith v Frew [1939] 4 All ER 358) of the loss was the dishonesty of their servant, they could not recover under the policy; if on the other hand it was the......
  • Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company and Bovis Lend Lease Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 5 Octubre 2004
    ...a loss and the question would then arise what was the cause of the loss. If the proximate cause (this seems to be the test; Goddard and Smith v. Frew) of the loss was the dishonesty of their servant, they could not recover under the policy; if on the other hand it was their own neglect, the......
  • Omega Proteins Ltd v Aspen Insurance UK Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 10 Septiembre 2010
    ...a loss and the question would then arise what was the cause of the loss. If the proximate cause (this seems to be the test; Goddard and Smith v Frew) of the loss was the dishonesty of their servant, they could not recover under the policy; if on the other hand it was their own neglect, they......
  • Thornton Springer v NEM Insurance Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN SINGAPORE: THE LEGAL CHALLENGE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1999, December 1999
    • 1 Diciembre 1999
    ...Robberds (1837) 6 Ad & El 75, 112 ER 29; Midland Insurance v Smith, supra n 292; Lind v Mitchell(1928) 45 TLR 54; Goddard Smith v Frew[1939] 4 All ER 358. See also Ohio Casualty Insurance Co v Welfare Finance Co(1934) 75 F 2d 58 (8th Cir), certiorari denied 296 US 734 (employer entitled to ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT