Goodbarne v Buck

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1939
Year1939
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Er Kee Jeng v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 15 March 2006
    ...set out in s 10 to avoid the policy were fulfilled. The Divisional Court in Durrant v Maclaren followed the case of Goodbarne v Buck [1940] 1 KB 107 at 113, in which Hilbery J It appears to me that this policy, from the time when the proposal form was filled up, and incorrectly filled up, w......
  • Public Insurance Company Ltd, The; Ratnam and Another
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1956
  • Society of Lloyd's v Leighs [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 23 April 1997
    ...Croft v LumleyENR (1858) 6 HLC 672; 10 ER 1459. Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate CoELR (1878) 3 App Cas 1218. Goodbarne v BuckUNK [1939] 4 All ER 107; [1940] 1 All ER 613. Hulton v HultonELR [1917] 1 KB 813. Lagunas Nitrate Co v Lagunas SyndicateELR [1899] 2 Ch 392. Lamport & Holt Lines Lt......
  • Araujo v Smith et Al
    • Bermuda
    • Court of Appeal (Bermuda)
    • 20 November 1997
    ...be committed by anyone who was in charge of the vehicle. In that case the court approved at p.293D the dictum of MacKinnon, L.J. in Goodbarne v. Buck [1940] 1 K.B. 771 that: “In order to make a person liable for permitting another person to use a motor vehicle, it is obvious that he must be......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT