Goodwin v Robarts
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1875 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
34 cases
-
Williamson v Rider
...This decision, being by three Judges of the Court of Queen's Bench, is not binding on us, and the decision has beencriticised in Goodwin v. Robarts, (1875) Law Reports, 10 Exchequer, 76 and 337, and, in the House of Lords, (1876) Law Reports, 1 Appeal Cases, 476; and in Rumball v. Metropoli......
-
Macmillan Inc. v Bishopsgate Investment Trust Plc (No. 3)
...result is that beneficial ownership is extinguished by an act of transfer recognised in the jurisdiction in which it occurs. See Goodwin v. Robarts [1875] LR 10 Ex Ch 337, affirmed (1875) 1 App Cas 476; Picker v. The London and County Banking Co. Ltd. (1887) 18 QBD 515, CA; and London Joint......
-
Pan-Electric Industries Ltd (in liquidation) v Sim Lim Finance Ltd and Others
...instruments. The absence of any such evidence of mercantile usage not only distinguishes this case from Goodwin v Robarts LR 10 Ex 76; 1 App Cas 476, but renders the reasoning on which that case was decided wholly inapplicable to the case now before us, and makes it unnecessary for us to co......
-
R v International Trustee for the Protection of Bondholders Aktiengesellschaft
...on the credit of the foreign Government.” 1Smith v. WeguelinELR (1869), L.R. 8 Eq. 198; 43 Digest 628, 682. 1Goodwin v. RobartsELR (1876), 1 App. Cas. 476; 6 Digest 451, 2Smith v. Weguelin, see note above. 3Smith v. Weguelin, see note above. 4N.V. Kwik Hoo Tong Handel Maatschappij v. James ......
Request a trial to view additional results