Goody v Baring

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1956
Year1956
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Seet Melvin v The Law Society of Singapore
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • May 18, 1995
    ...Clinton (1815) 19 Ves Jun 261; 34 ER 515; [1814-1823] All ER Rep 528 (distd) Flanagan v Fahy [1918] IR 2 KB 361 (distd) Goody v Baring [1956] 1 WLR 448; [1956] 2 All ER 11 (distd) Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489; [1954] 3 All ER 745 (folld) Lau Liat Meng v Disciplinary Committee [1965-196......
  • Palmer (Garnett) v Prince Golding and Etta Golding (Deceased after litigation commenced)
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • December 20, 2000
    ...the vendor was left free to sell the house at an advanced price - if the decision of the learned judge was right". In an earlier case of Goody v Baring [1956] 2 All ER 11 at 12 Dankwerts J said: "It seems to me practically impossible for a solicitor to do his duty to each client properly w......
  • Caroline Therese Mathiesen v Clintons (A Firm)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • October 11, 2013
    ...Mathiesen made submissions on these issues and reminded me about the risk of "happy hindsight". This phrase was coined by Dankwerts J in Goody v Baring [1956] 1 W.L.R. 448, at 452, to mean giving evidence based not so much on actual recollection as on usual practice and what would be likely......
  • Wee Hood Teck Development Corporation; Yong & Company
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT