Goulandris Brothers Ltd v B. Goldman & Sons Ltd (Granhill.)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1957 |
| Date | 1957 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
42 cases
- SUNLIGHT MERCANTILE PTE. Ltd and another v EVER LUCKY SHIPPING COMPANY Ltd
-
Cargill International S.A. v C.P.N. Tankers (Bermuda) Ltd (Ot Sonja)
...the authorities they are. They are claims that relate to the goods in the sense described by Mr. Justice Pearson (as he then was) in Goulandris v Goldman [1958] 1Q.B. 74. 25 It is the case in the present instance that two items of the first head of claim relate to loss and expense in respec......
-
Sunlight Mercantile Pte Ltd and Another v Ever Lucky Shipping Co Ltd
...meaning of the term “fault” in Rule D of the York-Antwerp Rules, the trial judge referred to Goulandris Brothers Ltd v Goldman & Sons Ltd [1958] 1 QB 74, where Pearson J explained that “fault” in Rule D refers to an actionable fault. For the purpose of determining whether or not there was a......
-
TKC London Ltd v Allianz Insurance Plc
...(1931); Cmd 3806) includes economic loss even in the absence of such physical damage (see Goulandris Bros Ltd v B Goldman & Sons Ltd [1957] 3 All ER 100 at 115, [1958] 1 QB 74 at 105 per Pearson J). However, that is not this case. The relevant words expressly require physical damage and f......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
General Average
...Trader]; see also Oak Hill (The), above note 4 at 1246. 77 [1931] A.C. 726. See also Goulandris Bros Ltd. v. B. Goldman &> Sons Ltd., [1958] 1 Q.B. 74. 78 171 U.S. 187 (1898). 79 Jason (The), 225 U.S. 32 (1908). 646 MARITIME LAW wise, the goods, shippers, consignees or owners of the goods s......