Gr v Cmec
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Neutral Citation | [2011] UKUT 101 (AAC) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Date | 2011 |
| Court | Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
CF v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and CG (CSM)
...reg 46(4), reg 46(4)(b), reg 46(5), reg 47, reg 50, reg 50(1), reg 50(1)(b), reg 50(2), reg 50(3). Cases referred to GR v CMEC (CSM)[2011] UKUT 101 (AAC), [2011] 2 FLR JS v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions[2017] UKUT 296 (AAC) (13 July 2017, unreported). R(CS) 11/02(8 April 2002, un......
-
JS v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and another (CSM)
...of “person with care” in section 3(3) of the 1991 Act. In this latter context, Upper Tribunal Judge Wikeley held in GR v CMEC (CSM) [2011] UKUT 101(AAC) that: “the meaning of “day to day care” for the purposes of section 3(3)(b) carries the same practical connotations as Mr Commissioner Jac......
-
JW v Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council (SEN)
...excessive zeal and not improper motive. The test is whether conduct permits of a reasonable explanation (HJ v London Borough of Brent [2011] UKUT 101 (AAC) and Ridehalgh v Horsefield EWCA Civ 40). 16. In Willow Court Management Company (1985) Ltd v Alexander [2016] UKUT 0290 (AAC) the Upper......
-
MR v (1) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and (2) LM
...of fact for the FtT in the light of all the evidence available to it. Such an approach is in my view consistent with GR [v CMEC [2011] UKUT 101 (AAC)] and (when allowance is made for the different legislative context) R(CS)11/02. In the context of reg 50, overnight care is therefore not a t......