Grace (G. W.) & Company Ltd v General Steam Navigation Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1950 |
| Date | 1950 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Compania Naviera Maropan S/A v Bowaters Lloyd Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd (Stork.)
... ... shipping superintendent in the defendant company, is in charge of shipping operations in ... in the charters party, apart from some general considerations which might be raised. The words ... a view he had expressed in the case of Grace v. General Stones Navingtion Company , which is ... B. Groec & Company, Limited, v, General Steam navigation. Limited ., which is reported in ... ...
- Kristiandsands Tankrederi A/S v Standard Tankers (Bahamas) Ltd (Polyglory)
-
Kodros Shipping Corporation v Empresa Cubana de Fletes (No. 2) (Evia)
...62My Lords, I can move forward for nearly a century to the decision of Devlin J., as he then was, in G. W. Grace & Co. Ltd. v. General Steam Navigation Co. Ltd.�The Sussex Oak [1950] 2 K.B. 383. I should make three observations regarding this case at the outset. First, I shall have to co......
- Transoceanic Petroleum Carriers v Cook Industries Inc. (Mary Lou)
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Carriage of Goods by Charterparty
...But this obligation is not interpreted to mean the ship must be maintained in a 210 G.W Grace &> Co.v. General Steam Navigation Co., [1950] 2 K.B. 383. 211 E.g., BALTIME, cls.l and 3, online at . Carriage of Goods by Charterparty 401 thoroughly efficient state for all purposes all of the ti......
-
THE SAFE PORT PROMISE OF CHARTERERS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE ENGLISH COMMON LAW
...Evia (No 2), supra n 37, at 749; 310, per Lord Diplock. 53 G W Grace & Co Ltd v General Steam Navigation Company Ltd (The Sussex Oak) [1950] 2 KB 383. 54 Id, at 304. 55 Supra n 39. 56 See above at paras 25—28, “Definition of ‘safe’ port”. 57 Supra n 37, at 757; 315, per Lord Roskill. 58 Cf ......