Grant Consolidation and the Development of Intergovernmental Relations in the United States and the United Kingdom

Published date01 April 1981
Date01 April 1981
AuthorEdward Page
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9256.1981.tb00044.x
Subject MatterArticle
Some
IVotes
OR
Gramsci's
Theory
of
the InteZZeetuaZs
29
A
change in the organisation of knowledge was a prerequisite for an expansion
of democracy. Politics in this view of a socialist society does not disappear
but
is
transformed. Crucial
to
understanding existing forms of politics
is
a
concrete study of
the
intellectuals and fundamental to
the
creation of a fully
developed democracy, of a socialist society, was
a
transformation of their role.
Re
ferenees
Gramsci,
A
(1965),
Gramsci,
A
(1971),
Wishart.
Gramsci,
A
(1975),
Gramsci,
A
(1978),
and Wishart.
Marramao,
G
(1977)
Letters
del carcere. Turin, Einaudi.
Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London, Lawrence and
Quaderni
del
carcere, Vol
I-IV.
Turin, Einaudi.
Selections from Political Writings, 1921-1926. London, Lawrence
,
Introduction
to
Austromarxismo
e
socialismo
di
sinistra fra
le due guerre. Milan, La Pietra.
Paggi,
L
(1974), Introduction to Max Adler.
11
socialismo
e
gli
intellettuali.
Bari,
De
Donato.
Razeto Migliaro,
L
and Misurance, P (19811, "Theory of Modern Bureaucracy" in
Showstack Sassoon (1981).
Showstack Sassoon,
A
(1980),
Gramsci's
Politics. London,
Croom
Helm.
Showstack Sasson,
A
ed (1981), Approaches to Gramsci. London, Writers and Readers
Publishing Cooperative.
Showstack Sassoon,
A
(198la),'Passive Revolution and
the
Politics
of
Reform'
in Showstack Sassoon (1981).
Vacca,
G
(1976), 'L'occasione "Politiecnico" (Note
su
alcuni elementi della
politica culturale di Tog1iatti)'in Lavoro critico,
Vol
5,
Yan-March.
Vacca,
G
(1977)
'La
"quistione po1itica"degli intellettuali
e
la
teoria dello
Stato nel pensiero
di
Gramsci',
in Politica
e
storia in
Gramsci,
Vol
I,
ed
by
Franco Ferru. Rome, Editori Riuniti.
(A
shortened version
in
Showstack Sassoon,
1981).
Vacca,
G
(1979),
'La
teoria
del
socialismo
in
Gramsci'.
Unpublished paper.
....................
GRANT CONSOLIDATIO~ AND THE DEVELOPMENT
OF
I~~TE~~OVE~N~E~TAL
RELATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES AND
THE
UNITED KINGDOPI'
€D~ARD
PAGE
The difference between the intergovernmental financial systems of
the
United
Kingdom and
the
United States
lies
less
in
the amount of money sub-national
governments receive from national or
state
levels than in
the
distribution of
grants. In both countries, local governments receive around 48 per cent of total
revenue from intergovernmental grants,
while
in
the
United
States, State
governments receive
28
per cent of their
tdal
revenue from grants.
The
way in
which grants
are
distributed
has
important implications for recipients which do
not need rehearsing
here;
they include
effects
upon the financial behaviour
of
local and state governments; on how functions are carried out and how sub-national
governments conduct
themselves
with respect to wider proceduies such as race
relations and citizen participation.
One common assumption in both the United States and the United Kingdom
is
that
grants which are
less
specific in the types of activity they finance offer
sub-national governments more 'autonomyt
or
discretion than grants which
are

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT