Grant v DPP

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtPrivy Council
Judgment Date1980
Year1980
Date1980

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
41 cases
  • Brooks v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 578E–F , 579B , E , H–580B , E–F ) ... Grant v. Director of Public Prosecutions [ 1982 ] A.C. 190 , P.C. applied ... Rex v. Philipps, Lucas and Gibson ( 1764 ) 3 Burr. 1564 and Rex v. Phillips ( 1767 ) 4 Burr. 2089 distinguished ... (2) That, although a defendant should only in exceptional circumstances be ... ...
  • R v Hanna
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 3 December 2007
    ...that of the evidence of witnesses and the judge”s careful directions (para. 12; paras. 14–15). Cases cited: (1) Grant v. D.P.P., [1982] A.C. 190; (1981), 30 W.I.R. 248, applied. (2) Montgomery v. H.M. Advocate, [2003] 1 A.C. 641; 2000 S.C.C.R. 1044; 2001 S.L.T. 37; 2001 S.C. (P.C.) 1, appli......
  • Hon Gordon Stewart OJ v Senator Noel Sloley Sr, Noel Sloley Jr, Gordon Brown, Deborah Lee Shung and Jamaica Tours Ltd
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 29 July 2011
    ... ... 14 [11] Part 17 deals with interim remedies and rule 17.1(1) empowers the court to grant a number of such remedies, including ‘(h) an order (referred to as a “search order”) requiring a party to admit another party to premises for the purpose of preserving evidence etc.’. Rule 17.2(1) provides that such an order may be made at any time, including ‘…before a claim has been ... ...
  • Tapper el al v Director of Public Prosecutions el al
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 8 February 1999
    ... ... Min. of Civil Service (supra); Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v Wednesbury Corp. [1947] 2 All E.R.680 King v. D.P.P. (Barbados) [1990] L.R.C. (Const.) H42 also reported at (1991) 40 W.I.R 15 ; Gladys Tappin v. Francis Lucas (1973) 20 W.I.R. 228 at 235 H and I; Grant and Others v. D.P.P. (1980) 30 W.I.R. 246 ; R. v. Scott (1991) L.R.C. (Crim.) 130 ... 98 Mr. Wildman also submitted that the decision of the D.P.P. to go by way of a voluntary bill instead of invoking the provision of S. 277 of the Judicature (R.M.) Act did not ... ...
  • Get Started for Free