Grant v Haigh
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Judge | Lord Pitmilly |
| Judgment Date | 12 May 1824 |
| Date | 12 May 1824 |
| Court | Court of Session (Inner House - Second Division) |
| Docket Number | No. 2. |
Court of Session
1st Division
Lord Pitmilly
No. 2.
Grant
and
Haigh
Expenses.—
The Lord Ordinary having refused a bill of suspension presented by Grant, in respect of no caution, and found him liable in expenses, he reclaimed, and offered caution. The Court remitted to pass on caution, and on payment of the expenses found due by the Lord Ordinary.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Vodafone Ltd v The Office of Communications
...them. The Sheriff claimed 3s 6d for the fourth. The Court held that the attorney would have been entitled to recover the excessive charges ( 3s 2d for each warrant) and so could set off those sums against the claim. Further, the Sheriff's only claim for recovery was at the rate of 4d. As ex......
-
Brownlee v R
...A History of the Law in Western Australia and its Development from 1829 to 1979, (1980) at 15. 241 2 Will IV c 3, s 1. 242 2 Will IV c 3, s 2. 243 2 Will IV c 3, s 244 2 Will IV c 3, ss 1 and 2. The Jury Act 1832 also expressly applied to Western Australian juries the same rules and forms a......
-
Ionian Bank Ltd v Couvreur
...to the Bank: 8 "We write to record the arrangements arrived at between us as follows; 9 "1. You have made a loan to this company of £14,913 3s 2d. which amount was credited by you to this company's account at Westminster Bank Limited on 19th October, 1965. 10 2. We understand that the rate ......