Gray v Gee
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1923 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Magill v Magill
...Duffy J. 174 Wright v Cedzich (1930) 43 CLR 493 . In England this action was extended to permit wives to sue as well: Gray v Gee (1923) 39 TLR 429; Newton v Hardy (1933) 49 TLR 175 Butterworth v Butterworth [1920] P 126 at 142. 176 Pritchard v Pritchard [1967] P 195 at 212 per Diplock LJ.......
- Wright v Cedzich
-
Best v Samuel Fox & Company Ltd
...husband by reason of the injury to him. Such a claim was put forward upon the analogy of the enticement cases of which the most recent are Gray v. Gee (1923) 39 T.L.R., 429 and Place v. Searle [1932] 2 K.B.D., 497. In the first, the jury found for the defendant, and in the latter, the state......
- Newton v Hardy