Gray v Johnston
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
Mary Malone, Catherine Malone, Elizabeth Malone, and Ellen Malone v The Belfast Banking Company, Ltd
... ... I am quite aware of the line of cases of which Gray v. Johnston ( 1 ) and Shields v. The Bank of Ireland ( 2 ) are types, and that the fact of the bank honouring Donaldson's cheque for £529 1 s ... ...
-
Lipkin Gorman (A Firm)(Appellants(Plaintiffs) v (1) Karpnale Ltd (formerly Playboy Club of London Ltd) (Respondent (2) Lloyds Bank Plc (Respondent(Defendant)
...out of that account: that is the plain general rule, as between banker and customer." 26 In the similar case of Gray v. Johnston [1868] L.R. 3 H.L. 1 Lord Cairns said: "I think, fortunately, your Lordships will find that the law on that point is clearly laid down, and may be derived without......
-
Scott v ANZ Bank New Zealand Ltd
...New Zealand Ltd v MAP & Associates Ltd [2011] NZSC 89, [2011] 3 NZLR 751 at [27]; Sandman, above n 8, at [77]–[78]. 10 Gray v Johnson (1868) LR 3 HL 1; Westpac, above n 9, at 11 Relying on Schmidt v Pepper New Zealand (Custodians) Ltd [2012] NZCA 565 at [15]; Three Rivers District Council ......
-
Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency v Dresdner Bank AG
...the mandate given to the banker provided that the banker has money in his hands belonging to the customer. As Lord Cairns LC stated in Gray v Johnston (1868) LR 3 HL 1 at 11, it would be a serious matter if bankers were to be allowed, on grounds of mere suspicion or curiosity, to refuse to ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Dishonest Assistance and Accessory Liability
...C. Mitchell, P. Mitchell and S. Watterson, Goff & Jones: The Law of Unjust Enrichment(London: Sweet & Maxwell, 8th ed, 2011) 28-04.87 (1868) LR 3 HL 1, 12. See also, Hartga vThe Bank of England (1796) 3 Ves Jr 55, 58 perLoughborough LC.88 (1845) 14 Sim 437, 441 per Shadwell VC. This rule is......
-
Nigeria's Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act 2004: a tighter noose
...CFAO Ltd v. Agbomagbe Bank Ltd (1966) 1 All NLR 16. Per Ademola J., ashe then was, quoting from Lord Westbury in Gray v. Johnson (1886) LR 3 HL 1:A bank is bound to honour any order of his customer with respect to the money belonging tothat customer which is an the hands of the bank, and it......