Gray v New Augarita Porcupine Mines Ltd

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1952
Date1952
Year1952
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
18 cases
  • Yeo Geok Seng v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 10 November 1999
    ...[1966] 3 All ER 721 (distd) Castlereagh Motels Ltd v Davies-Roe (1966) 67 SR (NSW) 279 (refd) Gray v New Augarita Porcupine Mines Ltd [1952] 3 DLR 1 (distd) London and Mashonaland Exploration Co Ltd v New Mashonaland Exploration Co Ltd [1891] WN 165 (distd) Oh Laye Koh v PP (1995) 1 CLAS 14......
  • Wingecarribee Shire Council v Lehman Brothers Australia Ltd (in Liquidation)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Instant Access Properties Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Mr Bradley John Rosser
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 13 April 2018
    ...that the shareholders are “fully informed of the real state of things,” as Lord Radcliffe said in Gray v. New Augarita Porcupine Mines [1952] 3 DLR 1 at 14. 66. Rimer J held that Mr Koshy, on whom the onus of proving full disclosure to shareholders lay, fell short of the requirements of the......
  • Gwembe Valley Development Company Ltd v Koshy and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 July 2003
    ...that the shareholders are "fully informed of the real state of things," as Lord Radcliffe said in Gray v. New Augarita Porcupine Mines [1952] 3 DLR 1 at 14. 66 Rimer J held that Mr Koshy, on whom the onus of proving full disclosure to shareholders lay, fell short of the requirements of the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
1 books & journal articles
  • SELF-DEALING AND NO-PROFIT RULES: COMPANIES ACT 2016
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2020, December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...BCLC 131. Note that in this case the concealment of the interest was deliberate and dishonest. 53 Gray v New Augarita Porcupine Mines Ltd [1952] 3 DLR 1 at 14, per Lord Radcliffe. This case dealt with the no-profit rule where the appellant had used his position in the company and made large......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT