Gray v Smith

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1889
Date1889
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Ng Teck Sim Colin v Teh Guek Ngor Engelin and Another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 24 Mayo 1995
  • R v Thompson & Son Ltd
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 25 Febrero 1920
    ...135. (8) 20 Ch. D. 705. (9) 50 L. J. Ch. 750. (10) 55 L. J. Ch. 335. (11) [1895] 2 Ch. 744. (12) [1912] 1 Ch. 284. (13) 8 Ch. D. 70. (14) 43 Ch. D. 208. (15) [1898] 2 Ch. 128. (16) 26 T. L. R. 534. (17) 6 H. L. C. 268. (18) 4 App. C. 311. (19) 45 Ch. D. 481; [1891] 1 Ch. 413. (20) [1916] 2 ......
  • Steadman v Steadman
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 Julio 1973
    ...enough for the pleader in each case merely to plead a partnership and that would amount to a repeal of the statute." 16 Finally there is Gray v. Smith (1890) 43 Chancery Division, 208, where Mr. Justice Kekewich said at page 211: "The authorities, when looked into, seem to establish that yo......
  • Rachel Calixte David Calixte Claimants v Ayrton Cornelius Sargusingh Administrator in the Estate of Garnet Sargusingh Defendant [ECSC]
    • St Lucia
    • High Court (Saint Lucia)
    • 24 Junio 2008
    ...the parties contemplating the execution of a more formal agreement, it was held to constitute a sufficient memorandum: see Gray v Smith (1889) 43 Ch D 208. It is therefore essential to prove that any informal agreement amounts to a concluded contract. 44 I am satisfied that the agreements i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT