Grays Haulage Go. Ltd v Arnold

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1966
Date1966
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 cases
  • Incorporated Law Society of Ireland v Carroll
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1996
    ...the type of knowledge required was either actual knowledge or a shutting of eyes to the obvious. Grays Haulage Co. Ltd. v. ArnoldWLR [1966] 1 W.L.R. 534 and James & Sons Ltd. v. SmeeELR [1955] 1 Q.B. 78 approved. Semble: That the use of the word "wilfully" in conjunction with words which we......
  • Nuttall v Vehicle Inspectorate
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 18 March 1999
    ...Central Garages (Exeter) Ltd. [1951] 2 T.L.R. 284, James & Son Ltd. v. Smee [1955] 1 Q.B. 78, and Grays Haulage Co. Ltd. v. Arnold [1966] 1 W.L.R. 534. 5 A driver of a vehicle who contravenes Community law restrictions on driving hours or driving distances commits an offence under section 9......
  • R. v. City of Sault Ste. Marie, (1978) 21 N.R. 295 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • 1 May 1978
    ...[1955] 1 Q.B. 78, consd. [para. 48]. Somerset v. Hart (1884), 12 Q.B.C. 360, consd. [para. 48]. Grays Haulage Co. Ltd. v. Arnold, [1966] 1 All E.R. 896, consd. [para. R. v. Peconi (1907), 1 C.C.C.(2d) 213, consd. [para. 48]. Alphacell Limited v. Woodward, [1972] A.C. 824, consd. [para. 48].......
  • Mohammed Latif v Middlesbrough Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 24 March 1997
    ..."The first sentence of the first paragraph is an exact quotation from the judgment of Lord Parker CJ in Gray's Haulage Co. Ltd. v Arnold [1966] 1 WLR 534, 537F, which was accepted by Edmund Davies L.J., giving the judgment of this Court in Souter (1971) 55 Cr.App.R. 403, 408; [1971] 1 W.L.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Two Recent Scottish Decisions, II
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 34-4, October 1970
    • 1 October 1970
    ...blindness), recklessness,or perhaps negligence. James &Son Ltd. v.Smeesuggestedthatknowledge was required.Gray'sHaulageCo.v. Arnold(1966, 1 W.L.R.534) whichappearsnottohavebeen citedto the court, emphasisedthatnegligence wasnotenough (see also,Fransmanv.Sexton,(1965), C.Recklessness inGray'......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT