Great Western Ry. Company v Bater

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date13 March 1922
Date13 March 1922
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
40 cases
  • Watson v Rowles (Inspector of Taxes)
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Brander & Cruickshank
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session (Inner House - First Division)
    • 8 December 1970
    ...to the proper legal issue by taking as their guide the well-known dictum of Rowlatt J. in Great Western Railway Co. v. Bater(1) [1920] 3 K.B. 266, at page 274, approved by Lord Atkin in McMillan v. Guest(2) [1942] A.C. 561, at page 564. They therefore inquired whether the registrarship was ......
  • R v East Berkshire Health Authority, ex parte Walsh
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 14 May 1984
    ...3 Weekly Law Reports 707, where the House of Lords approved the dictum of Mr. Justice Rowlatt in Great Western Railway Co. v. Bater (1920) 3 King's Bench 266 at page 274 that an office was something: "Which was a subsisting, permanent, substantive position, which had an existence independen......
  • Mitchell and Edon (HM Inspectors of Taxes) v Ross
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 6 July 1961
    ...(the decision in which by the House of Lords was the occasion for the transfer from Schedule D to Schedule E in 1922), Rowlatt, J. ([1920] 3 K.B. 266, at page 274) used the language: an office or employment which was a subsisting, permanent, substantive position, which had an existence inde......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT