Green Lane, Ilford, Re 462

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1971
Date1971
CourtChancery Division
[CHANCERY DIVISION] In re 462 GREEN LANE, ILFORD. GOODING v. BORLAND [1968 G. No. 3421] 1970 Oct. 26, 27 Ungoed-Thomas J.

Practice - Writ - Originating summons - Proceedings commenced by summons - Fraud alleged - Whether action to continue as if commenced by writ - R.S.C., Ord. 5, r. 2F1; Ord. 28, r. 8F2

The plaintiff's action was commenced by an originating summons pursuant to an order made by the Chief Land Registrar, to determine whether a caution registered against the plaintiff's registered freehold title in certain property should continue or be cancelled. The plaintiff pleaded non est factum in respect of the contract for the sale of the land, the subject matter of the caution; and in the alternative he alleged fraud on the same facts.

On the preliminary point whether the action was properly started: —

Held, that R.S.C., Ord. 5, r. 2 placed a case based on an allegation of fraud outside Ord. 28, r. 8 and, accordingly, the proceedings begun by originating summons could not be continued pursuant to Ord. 28, r. 8 as though commenced by a writ but had to be started by writ.

In re Engall's Agreement [1953] 1 W.L.R. 977 applied.

The following case is referred to in the judgment:

Engall's Agreement, In re [1953] 1 W.L.R. 977; [1953] 2 All E.R. 503.

No additional cases were cited in argument.

PRELIMINARY POINT

The plaintiff, Edwin Julian Gooding, of 462, Green Lane, Ilford, Essex (“the proprietor”) was registered on December 2, 1962, as the proprietor of the freehold land known as 462, Green Lane, Ilford, comprised in title No. EX 42887 (“the land”). On March 15, 1968, a caution was registered under section 54 of the Land Registration Act 1925, in favour of the defendant, Ernest Courtney Borland, of Bedford Hill, London, S.W. (“the cautioner”).

The cautioner in his statutory declaration in support of his caution declared that on January 19, 1968, a contract for the sale of the land was made between the proprietor and himself and that he had paid £247 3s. to the proprietor.

Pursuant to rule 218 of the Land Registration Rules 1925, the proprietor applied for notice under section 55 of the Act of 1925 to be served for warning-off the cautioner. The notice was served and the cautioner objected to the cancellation of the caution.

On September 30, 1968, the Chief Land Registrar made an order under R.S.C., Ord. 93, r. 10 and rule 220 (4) Of the Rules of 1925 requiring the proprietor to take out, within eight weeks of the date of the order, an originating summons for bringing the matter before the court and, in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT