Greenwich Healthcare National Health Service Trust v London and Quadrant Housing Trust

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date22 May 1998
Date22 May 1998
CourtChancery Division

Chancery Division

Before Mr Justice Lightman

Greenwich Healthcare National Health Service Trust
and
London Quadrant Housing Trust and Others

Right of way - servient owner proposing realignment - court's power to anticipate injunction claim

Court's power to anticipate injunction claim

The court had jurisdiction to grant a declaration that the dominant owner of a right of way who had yet to assert a claim to an injunction to prevent the servient owner from realigning the right of way was not entitled to it.

Mr Justice Lightman so held in the Chancery Division in a reserved judgment, when, inter alia, granting the plaintiff, Greenwich Healthcare National Health Service Trust, a declaration that the defendants, London and Quadrant Housing Trust, the London Borough of Greenwich, Cavendish Kerrington Plc, Kerrington Developments III plc, Eurocity Properties plc, Parkloan Ltd, London Electricity plc, Annington Property Ltd and the Secretary of State for Defence, were not entitled to claim an injunction if and when the plaintiff, as part of a proposed development, realigned a road over which the defendants enjoyed a right of way, so that it ran over land in respect of which the eighth defendant, Annington Property Ltd, was entitled to the benefit of a restrictive covenant.

Mr George Laurence, QC and Mr Nicolas Terras for the plaintiff; Mr Joseph Harper, QC for the eighth defendant; the other defendants did not appear and were not represented.

MR JUSTICE LIGHTMAN said that even if the defendants had a cause of action, they had no right to an injunction to restrain the plaintiff from proceeding with the realignment, since it was necessary to achieve an object of substantial public importance and value, namely making a dangerous road junction...

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 cases
  • Pacific Rover Pte Ltd v Yickvi Realty Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 18 March 2009
    ...with a minor variation: at [11] and [13]. Greenwich Healthcare National Health Service Trust v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [1998] 1 WLR 1749 (folld) Ling Tien Wah and Norman Ho (Rodyk & Davidson LLP) for the plaintiff Tan Chau Yee and Bernice Tan (Harry Elias Partnership) for the defe......
  • Howard John Kettel and Others v Bloomfold Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 25 May 2012
    ...to extinguish an easement over one area of land on provision of an equivalent easement over another-see Greenwich NHS Trust v London & Quadrant Housing Association [1998] 1 WLR 1749- and I held in Heslop v Bishton [2009] EWHC 607 (Ch) that obstruction of the easement originally granted did ......
  • Ayliffe, Swain and Percy v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 21 April 2005
    ...alia, disrupting the activity: the person must intend to disrupt the specified activity. Nelder v. Director of Public ProsecutionTLR The Times, 11 June 1998, of which we have a transcript dated 3 June 1998, seems to me to support the above. In that case the charge related to disrupting a hu......
  • Richardson and another v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 5 February 2014
    ...to extend to the actions of the particular chainsaw operator(s) spotted. Two years later in Nelder v Director of Public Prosecutions The Times, 11 June 1998 a different Divisional Court considered the case of hunt saboteurs who set out to disrupt a hunt. They adduced evidence that at the ou......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
  • Litigation - Remedies and Practice
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part IV. Restrictive covenants (freehold land)
    • 30 August 2016
    ...should normally be made using the procedure in CPR, Pt 8. See also Greenwich Healthcare NHS Trust v London & Quadrant Housing Trust [1998] 1 WLR 1749, where the claimant sought a declaration that none of the defendants would be entitled to an injunction (termed a negative declaration) shoul......
  • Particular Easements and Examples of Analogous Remedies of Relevance to Development
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part I. Easements and profits à prendre
    • 30 August 2016
    ...owner had obstructed a towpath by the erection of a bridge. 17 Greenwich Healthcare NHS Trust v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [1998] 1 WLR 1749, where a road over which the defendants enjoyed a right of way was to be realigned in order to make safe a dangerous road junction. The court c......
  • Pregnant drug users, fetal persons, and the threat to Roe v. Wade.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 62 No. 3, March - March 1999
    • 22 March 1999
    ...had "held down a job, supported her three young children and said she was drug-free'); Bob Herbert, Pregnancy and Addiction, N.Y. TIMES, June 11, 1998, at A31 (discussing South Carolina's misguided law and the fact that it applied to Ms. Crawley even though "her son from that pregnancy is n......
  • Protecting pregnant women: a guide to successfully challenging criminal child abuse prosecutions of pregnant drug addicts.
    • United States
    • Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Vol. 99 No. 3, June 2009
    • 22 June 2009
    ...afford to have two or three cocaine babies from the same person." Id. (74) Bob Herbert, In America; Pregnancy and Addiction, N.Y. TIMES, June 11, 1998, at (75) In addition to the various well-known psychological factors that make drug addiction particularly difficult to cure, "[m]any drug t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT