Greg v Planque
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1936 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
London and North Eastern Railway Company v Berriman
...enables the signalman to adjust the points is engaged in the work of repair. I find some support for this conclusion from the case of Greg v. Planque [1936] 1 K.B. 669 with which decision I agree. 35 For these reasons I would dismiss the appeal. Lord Macmillan My Lords, 36 On 27th December,......
- George Whitehouse Ltd (Trading as Clarke Bros (Services) v Anglian Water Authority
-
Sandton Town Council v Erf 89 Sandown Extension 2 (Pty) Ltd
...owner which has to be restored.' Cases in which the wider meaning of 'damage' has been found to be appropriate include Greg v Planque [1936] 1 KB 669; Goulandris Bros v B Goldmann & Sons [1958] 1 QB 74 at 105; and Nippon Yusen Kaisha v Acme Shipping Corporation [1972] 1 WLR 74 at 78 - 80. T......
-
Fu Loong Lithographer Pte Ltd and others v Mok Wing Chong (Tan Keng Lin and others, third parties)
...building work (at 416): The fact that repair includes replacement and renewal is clearly established, for example, by Greg v. Planque ([1936] 1 KB 669 at 677]), and in Burns v. National Coal Board ([1957 SC 239 at 246]), Lord Patrick said: ‘It is true that the primary meaning of the word ‘r......
Request a trial to view additional results