Griffiths v We & Dt Cave Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1999 |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Multi Link Leisure Developments Limited V. North Lanarkshire Council
... ... In this context he referred me to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Griffiths v W.E. and D. T. Cave Ltd. (1998) 78 P&CR 8. He also referred to McCall's Entertainments (Ayr) Ltd. v South Ayrshire Council (No.1) 1998 SLT 1403 ... ...
-
Multi-Link Leisure Developments Ltd v North Lanarkshire Council
...in the future: Raja Vyricherla Narayana Gajapatiraju v The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizagapatam [1939] AC 302, 313; see also Griffiths v WE & DT Cave Ltd (1998) 78 P&CR 8, 14. It is the words which follow that give rise to difficulty, when an attempt is made to construe the clause as a w......
-
Multi-Link Leisure Developments Ltd v North Lanarkshire Council
...ER 46 Gajapatiraju v Revenue Divisional Officer, VizagapatamELRUNK [1939] AC 302; [1939] 2 All ER 317 Griffiths v WE and DT Cave Ltd (1999) 78 P & CR 8; (1998) 95 (48) LSG 32 Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building SocietyWLRUNKUNK [1998] 1 WLR 896; [1998] 1 All ER 98; [1......
-
Multi Link Leisure Developments V. North Lanarkshire Council
...Home Limited v Marshall (1993) 66 P&CR 90 (a judgment of Warner J. in the Chancery Division); Griffiths v W.E. and D.T. Cave Limited (1999) 78 P&CR 8 (a decision of the Court of Appeal in England). In both cases, the words used were 'open market value' but that is not a material difference ......