Grimaldi Compagnia di Navigazione SpA v Sekihyo Lines Ltd [QBD (Comm)]

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMance J.
Judgment Date24 June 1998
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
Date24 June 1998
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
18 cases
  • SOS Corporacion Alimentaria SA v Inerco Trade SA [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 8 February 2010
    ...process to which ex hypothesi the applying party had agreed, the opposite conclusion had been reached.” 73 In The Seki Rolette [1998] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 638 at 645, Mance J observed that where there is an available arbitral process for obtaining an extension of time, in most cases that can be e......
  • Borgship Tankers Inc. v Product Transport Corporation Ltd (The Casco) [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 28 February 2005
    ...[1993] 2 Lloyd's Rep 435 (CA); The Marinor supra (Colman J); The Stolt Sydness [1997] 1 Lloyd's Rep 273 (Rix J); The Seki Rolette [1998] 2 Lloyd's Rep 638 (Mance J); and Linea Naviera Paramaconi S.A. v Abnormal Load Engineering Ltd [2001] 1 Lloyd's Rep 763 (Tomlinson J). 33 As to the Marin......
  • Monella and another v PizzaExpress (Restaurants) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 27 November 2003
    ...Court in Cathiship S.A. V. Allansons Ltd [1998] 3 All ER 714, or Mance J in Grimaldi Compagnia di Navigazione v. Sekihyo Lines Ltd [1999] 1 W.L.R. 708. Nor do I myself think that it differs very much from the approach of Judge Raymond Jack QC sitting as a judge of the High Court in the Comm......
  • Harbour and General Works Ltd v Environment Agency
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 October 1999
    ...judge of the High Court in the Commercial Court in Cathiship SA v Allansons Ltd [1998] 3 All ER 714; or Mance J in Grimaldi Compagnia di Navigazione SpA v Sekihyo Line Ltd [1998] 3 All ER 943. Nor do I myself think that it differs very much from the approach of Judge Raymond Jack QC sitting......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT