Grunwald v Hughes

JurisdictionScotland
Date1965
Year1965
CourtCourt of Session (Inner House - Second Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Preferred Mortgages Limited V. Robert Thomson Shanks+mark Robert Shanks+andrew F Dewar
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 7 February 2008
    ...wrong", has been treated as the criterion for distinguishing when a joint and several conclusion is competent. [14] In Grunwald v Hughes, 1965 SLT 209, the pursuers had employed an architect to design and supervise structural alterations to the premises in which they carried on a restaurant......
  • Persimmon Homes+charles Church Developments V. Bjr Realisations Limited+sean Donaghey
    • United Kingdom
    • Sheriff Court
    • 25 September 2013
    ...Foundry & Engineering Company v John Lewis & Sons Limited 1917 SC 341, Fleming v McGillivray 1946 SC 1 and Grunwald v Hughes & Others 1965 SLT 209, Turnbull v Flame 1966 SLT 24. I do not think these cases are helpful. This is not an attempt to convene different defenders with different inte......
  • Ruddy v Chief Constable, Strathclyde Police
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court (Scotland)
    • 28 November 2012
    ...And joint and several liability may follow where two different breaches of contract have produced a common result: see Grunwald v Hughes 1965 SLT 209. 23 In Barr v Neilson (1868) 6 M 651 the pursuer raised an action against a husband and his wife conjunctly and severally or severally for on......
  • Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Trust v Hammond (No. 3)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 25 April 2002
    ...It had already been held that the doctrine of joint and several liability applies in cases of breach of contract as well as in delict: Grunwald v Hughes, 1965 SLT 209. As Lord Justice-Clerk Grant put it, at p 211, the test is the same whether the action is based on delict or on contract. I......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Global Claims and Concurrency: Where Have We Got To And Where Are We Going?
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 3 December 2013
    ...separate contract breakers cause 'one common result', they are jointly and severally liable to the pursuer: Grunwald v Hughes and Others (1965) SLT 209. This is no different from the law in England. However, in the Scottish case of McGillivray v Davidson (1993) SLT 693, it appears to have b......
1 books & journal articles
  • Rights of relief, subrogation and unjustified enrichment in Scots law
    • South Africa
    • Juta Acta Juridica No. , December 2019
    • 24 December 2019
    ...3 Macq 833; Br itish Railways Board v Ross and Cromarty County Council 1974 SLT 274 at 280; 1974 SC 27. Also cited was Grunwald v Hughes 1965 SLT 209. © Juta and Company (Pty) 504 PRIVATE LAW IN A CHANGING WORLDLord Ross also held that there is a ‘common obligation’ if the obligations are ‘......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT