GS (Article 8 — Public interest not a fixity) Serbia and Montenegro

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2005] UKIAT 121
Date2005
Year2005
CourtImmigration Appeals Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • R (Karas and Miladinovic) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 7 April 2006
    ...of State for the Home Department v Akaeke [2005] EWCA Civ 947, GS (Article 8 – public interest not a fixity) Serbia and Montenegro [2005] UKIAT 00121, K v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWCA Civ 1655 and Janosevic v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWC......
  • WK (Palestinian Territories) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Asylum and Immigration Tribunal
    • 23 August 2006
    ... ... , Storey SIJ and Perkins SIJ WK (Article 8—Expulsion Cases—Review of Case-Law) ... 828 BK (Kosovo—Subesh) Serbia and Montenegro [2005] UKIAT 00001 ... 524, ECtHR GS (Article 8public interest not a fixesy) Serbia and Montenegro ... , GS (Article 8public interest not a fixity) Serbia and Montenegro [2005] UKAIT 00121, ... ...
  • MF (Article 8 - New Rules) Nigeria [Upper Tribunal]
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 31 October 2012
    ...case law has held that a proportionality assessment can never treat the public interest as immutable: see GS (Article 8, public interest not a fixity) Serbia and Montenegro [2005] UKAIT 000121. Whether the new rules do now (at least in some contexts) treat the public interest as a fixity is......
  • PO (interests of the state –Article 8)
    • United Kingdom
    • Asylum and Immigration Tribunal
    • 24 October 2006
    ...of the state and wider community do not carry a fixed weight ( GS (Article 9 -public interest not a fixity) Serbia and Montenegro [2005] UKIAT 00121), the only factors that might justify heavy weight not being given are likely to be where the state has shown by its own action or inaction th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT