Gulielm's Case

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1662
Date01 January 1662
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 280

King's Bench Division

Gulielm's Case

gulielm's case. Nota, per Jones, qs si la file consent al ravisher, & le prochein heir enter, & file le morust; la heir est ore eins per discent.

English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 288

King's Bench Division

Gulielm's Case

gulielm's case. Nota, En cest ease fuit dit p Doderidge, si un passenger lodge trois jours en un nn, ensemble, que le hostler nest answerable pur ses biens sils sont emble hors de chamber. Per 1'auncient ley un traveller fuit issint appell le primer jour, quia nest LATCH, 89. WHITTON V. SIR THOMAS WESTON 289 conus p q, il veigne: le second jour eat appell un Hogen Hinde, & le teire jour uu menial servant; et p le eigne articles, un hostler fuit responaal g luy, come son servant, en le leet.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Priestley v Aclean
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1860
    ...(c) This is material, for if the plaintiff were in the inn as lodger he could not recover ; Parker v Flint, 12 Mod 255 ; Gubelm'a Case, Latch 88 ; Sands' Case, Mod 877. (d) See Ross v. Hill, 2 Com B. Rep. 877, as to the force of these words. 2 P. &F. 285. FILTPOWSKI V. MERRYWEATHER 1063 The......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT