Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Gull v Scarborough (Note)

Cited authorities 2 Cited in 2 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1987
Year1987
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Preliminary Sections
    • August 29, 2015
    ...Grundy, DPP v [2006] EWHC 1157 (Admin)! 257 .................................................................. Gull v Scarborough [1987] RTR 261, DC! 2 Gumbley v Cunningham [1989] AC 281, [1989] 2 WLR 1, [1989] 1 All ER 5, ............................................. ! [1989] RTR 49, [1989......
  • The Requirement to Provide Specimens
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Contents
    • August 29, 2015
    ...Crim LR 655 (HL)] might have come into play. But there is nothing of that sort suggested here”. Appeal dismissed. Gull v Scarborough [1987] RTR 261, 12 November 1985, QBD (DC) Lawful arrest is not a prerequisite for requiring a blood or urine specimen. A motorist had been charged with faili......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT