H. v H

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
Year1953
Date1953

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • Szechter (orse. Karsov) v Szechter
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
    ...De Reneville v. De Reneville [1948] P. 100; [1948] 1 All E.R. 56, C.A. Griffith v. Griffith [1944] I.R. 35. H. v. H. [1954] P. 258; [1953] 3 W.L.R. 849; [1953] 2 All E.R. Hartmann v. Konig (1933) 50 T.L.R. 114, H.L.(E.). Kenward v. Kenward [1951] P. 124; [1950] 2 All E.R. 297, C.A. Lloyd v.......
  • S v Minister for Justice
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 24 July 2020
    ...South Africa and immediately on entry and marriage to live with another man, Mr. Holden. A similar view was taken in H (Orse. D.) v. H [1954] P. 258; [1953] 3 W.L.R. 849, where a Hungarian lady married her cousin, a French citizen, so that she could obtain a passport and leave Hungary. The ......
  • Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...[1909] P. 67. Fender v. St. John-Mildway [1938] A.C. 1; [1937] 3 All E.R. 402, H.L.(E.). H. v. H. [1954] P. 258; [1953] 3 W.L.R. 849; [1953] 2 All E.R. 1229. Kenward v. Kenward [1951] P. 124; [1950] 2 All E.R. 297, C.A. Lee v. Lau [1967] P. 14; [1964] 3 W.L.R. 750; [1964] 2 All E.R. 248. Le......
  • Kelly v Ireland
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1996
    ...D.A.K. was a sham was on the respondents and the respondents had failed so to prove. Cases mentioned in this report:— H. (orse. D.) v. H. [1954] P. 258; [1953] 3 W.L.R. 849; [1953] 2 All E.R. 1229. R.S.J. v. J.S.J. [1982] I.L.R.M. 263. Martens v. Martens [1952] 3 S.A.L.R. 771. Orlandi v. Ca......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Marriage
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 July 2022
    ...3 DLR 493 (Sask KB); Thompson v Thompson (1971), 19 DLR (3d) 608 (Sask QB). Pascuzzi v Pascuzzi (1955), 1 RFL (Rep) 262 (HCJ). H v H, [1953] 2 All ER 1229. Chapter 2: In RH v RT,55 Maisonville J, of the British Columbia Supreme Court, accepted the subjective test set out in Scott v Sebright......
  • Marriage
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 August 2020
    ...3 DLR 493 (Sask KB); Thompson v Thompson (1971), 19 DLR (3d) 608 (Sask QB). Pascuzzi v Pascuzzi (1955), 1 RFL (Rep) 262 (HCJ). H v H, [1953] 2 All ER 1229. 2011 BCSC 678; see also Ross-Scott v Groves Estate, 2014 BCSC 435; Natani v Nasiri, 2018 BCSC (1886), 12 PD 21 at 23–24. RH v RT, 2011 ......
  • TRICKED INTO MARRIAGE.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 42 No. 1, August 2018
    • 1 August 2018
    ...courts have refused to annul sham marriages made for immigration purposes based upon the parties' mental reservations: see, eg, H v H [1954] P 258, 264 (Karminski J); Silver v Silver [1955] 1 WLR 728. This is based upon an older principle that a person should not be able to assert his or he......