H v H (Abduction: Acquiescence)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1996
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Attorney General (Central Authority) v Young (nee New) 2001 Civil Jur. No. 90
    • Bermuda
    • Supreme Court (Bermuda)
    • September 5, 2001
    ...immediate return under the Convention. Re O (Abduction: Consent and Acquiescence)FLRUNK [1997] 1 FLR 924, [1997] Fam Law 469, H v HFLR[1996] 2 FLR 570, 574G. Secondly, the factors which govern the exercise of the discretion were suggested by Waite J in W v W (Child Abduction: Acquiescence)F......
  • Re H (Abduction: Acquiescence)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • April 10, 1997
  • B T v J R T
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • May 22, 2008
    ...England. Waite J considered the same question in W v W (Child Abduction: Acquiescence) (1993) 2 FLR 211 (approved by the Court of Appeal in H v H (1996) 2 FLR 21, overruled by the House of Lords on acquiescence in Re M but I have found helpful on discretion). It was whether the mother woul......
  • T B v J B (Abduction: Grave Risk of Harm)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • December 19, 2000
    ...v W (Child Abduction: Acquiescence) [1993] 2 FLR 211 and later adopted by him in the Court of Appeal in H v H (Abduction: Acquiescence) [1996] 2 FLR 570, at p 574. Apart from (c), the consequences of the acquiescence, which is irrelevant here, these were (a) the comparative suitability of t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT