Haggitt v Iniff

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date21 December 1854
Date21 December 1854
CourtHigh Court of Chancery

English Reports Citation: 43 E.R. 1124

BEFORE THE LORDS JUSTICES.

Haggitt
and
Iniff

See Cooke v. Wilby, 1884, 25 Ch. D. 770.

[910] hagoitt v. iniff. Before the Lords Justices. Dec. 21, 1854. [See Cooke v. Wilhy, 1884, 25 Ch. I). 770.] Affidavits may be still sworn before notaries public in foreign countries (having authority there to administer oaths) according to the old practice, which is not altered in this respect by 15 & 16 Viet. c. 86, s. 22. Mr. Nalder applied to their Lordships for a direction that the clerk of records and writs might place on the file an affidavit, sworn before Mr. Allen, a notary public at 3DBQ.M.&O.M1. EVANS V. COVENTRY 1125 Geneva, in the county of Ontario, in the State of New York, in America. The fact of Mr. Allen being a notary public, and that credit ought to be given to his official acts, was certified by the British Consul at New York, under the official seal. The clerk of records and, writs doubted whether the jurat was sufficient. There was an affidavit of the solicitor in the cause, stating that he had applied to General Campbell, the American Consul in England, who informed him that notaries public in the United States were authorized by law to administer oaths in any law proceedings in that country. The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Levitt v Levitt
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 1 June 1865
    ...to Omichund v. Barker (1 Sm. L. C. 381); Meek v. Ward (10 Hare, App. 1); Garvey v. Hibbert (1 J. & W. 180); Haggitt v. Iniff (5 De G. M. & G. 910); on the sufficiency of the certificate to Re Earl's Trusts (4 K. & J. 300.) the vice-chancellor [Sir W. Page Wood], after consultation with the ......
  • Re Earl's Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 30 July 1858
    ...was, in fact, a notary public. Mr. Collins now applied for leave to have the document filed as an affidavit, citing Eaggitt v. Iniff (5 De G. M. & G. 910). [301] the vice-chancellor. In that case there was a certificate under the official seal of our own consul at New York that the person b......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT