Hall v Cox

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1899
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
  • The Secretary of State for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Amway (Uk) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 May 2008
    ...prize” depends to any extent (more than de minimis) upon the exercise of skill then there is no lottery (Re Senator at p 585–6 following Hall v Cox [1899] 1 QB 198 and Moore v Elphick [1945] 2 All ER 155). Finally, whilst these factors have been identified as relevant in particular cases it......
  • Re Titan Marketing Gesellschaft; Senator Hanseatische Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 July 1996
    ...or other prizes entirely by chance or, in other words, by the equivalent of drawing lots. He cited Taylor v Smetten (1883) 11 QBD 207, Hall v Cox [1899] 1 QB 198 and Scott v DPP [1914] 868, which do indeed support this general proposition. Building on this Mr Bannister submitted that since ......
  • Imperial Tobacco Ltd v Attorney General
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 March 1979
    ...the law against lotteries by bringing in an element of "fore-casting (as in those cases I have mentioned, as in Stoddart v. Sagar and hill v. Cox) or a small element of skill (as in Salt v. D.P.P.). In order to suppress these evasions, Parliament passed this Act rendering competitions unlaw......
  • News of the World Ltd v Friend
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 31 January 1973
    ...already in the past, but whose result was not known (e.g. the number of births and deaths in London in a given week; c.f. Hall v. Cox [1899] 1 Q.B. 198 [1899] 1 Q.B. 198 C.A.). On the other hand, competitions, the final result of which was determined by chance were lotteries and, therefore,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Gambling Comparative Guide
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 26 October 2022
    ...the game thereby becomes a matter of chance. That position has a long pedigree in English law, reaching back as far as Hall v Cox [1899] 1 QB 198. In the context of video games, the winning of 'in-game' prizes or 'loot boxes' by chance is outside the definition of 'gaming', even if the play......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT