Hall v Duke of Norfolk
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1900 |
| Year | 1900 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
- Ampang Estate Ltd; Guan Soon Tin Mining Company
-
Holbeck Hall Hotel Ltd and Another v Scarborough Borough Council
...liable irrespective of negligence. 28 To a similar effect were the cases of Greenwell v Low Beechburn Coal Co. [1897] 2 QB 165 and Hall v Duke of Norfolk [1900] 2 Ch 493 where it was held that a landowner was not liable for damage caused to neighbouring land by subsidence occasioned by ex......
-
Angus v National Coal Board
...v. Butterley CoELR., [1920] 1 Ch. 130. 13 Greenwell v. Low Beechburn Coal CoELR., [1897] 2 Q. B. 165; Hall v. Duke of NorfolkELR, [1900] 2 Ch. 493;Geddes's Trustees v. HaldaneUNK, (1906) 14 S. L. T. 14 Wilson v. WaddellELR, (1876) 4 R. (H. L.) 29, 2 App. Cas. 95. 15 18 R, 788. 16 1931 S. C.......
-
Rowbotham v Wilson
...10 Q.B.D. 558; Dixon v. White, 1883, 8 A.C. 834; Darley Main Colliery Co. v. Mitchell, 1886.11 A.C. 133; Hall v. Norfolk (Duke of) (1900), 2 Ch. 493. Land - Surface - Support to Minerals - House - Grant - Release. ... '. i òò n- 3- /ff '/."4 [348] HENRY ROWBOTHAM, and Others, - Plaintiffs i......
Request a trial to view additional results