Hallen Company v Brabantia (UK) Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1990 |
| Court | Chancery Division (Patents Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
Laboratorios Almirall SA v Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH
...tests—obvious as they were—involved This approach is entirely consistent with the original ‘golden bonus’ case in this jurisdiction, Hallen v Brabantia [1991] RPC 195. If it is obvious to make a combination for one reason (in that case the combination of the Teflon coating on a corkscrew) i......
-
Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd (trading as Mylan) and Others
...amended to the court's satisfaction. The limits of the meaning of the term "partially valid" have not been fully explored. However, in Hallen v Brabantia [1990] FSR 134, this court held that a claim was partially valid where, by virtue of the cascade of claim dependencies, it could be const......
-
Kirin-Amgen Inc. v Transkaryotic Therapies Inc. (No.2)
...valid patent without requiring amendment." He reached that decision based on his earlier decision in Hallen Co. v Brabantia (UK) Limited [1990] FSR 134 at 138, and on the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in C. Van der Lely [1964] RPC 54. 55 The same view was taken by Millett LJ when Gerber ......
-
Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Others
...to excise an invalid claim or an invalid combination of claims if the patent contains a valid claim or combination of claims: see Hallen Co v Brabantia (UK) Ltd [1990] FSR 134 at 140 (Aldous J), Gerber Garment Technology Inc v Lectra Systems Ltd [1994] FSR 471 at 483 (Aldous J), Kirin Amgen......
Request a trial to view additional results