Halsey v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1961
Year1961
CourtQueen's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
62 cases
  • Colour Quest Ltd v Total Downstream UK Plc [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 20 March 2009
    ...regard to the later authorities set out below, I feel unable to accord it the significance that Total invites. 417 In Halsey v. Esso Petroleum [1961] 1 WLR 683 the issue was whether there was liability for the impact of hot acid smuts on washing hung out to dry in the plaintiff's garden as ......
  • Hunter et al. v. Canary Wharf Ltd.; Hunter et al. v. London Docklands Development Corp., (1997) 215 N.R. 1 (HL)
    • Canada
    • 24 April 1997
    ...to. [para. 115]. Moss v. Christchurch Rural District Council, [1925] 2 K.B. 750, refd to. [para. 115]. Halsey v. Esso Petroleum Co., [1961] 1 W.L.R. 683, refd to. [para. British Celanese Ltd. v. Hunt (A.H.)(Capacitors) Ltd., [1969] 1 W.L.R. 159, refd to. [para. 115]. Howard Electric Ltd. v.......
  • Michael John Smith v Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 7 February 2024
    ...Petroleum Co Ltd [1954] 2 QB 182 (CA) (reversed on appeal in Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Southport Corp [1956] AC 216 (HL)); and Halsey v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd [1961] 1 WLR 683 (QB). 223 Attorney-General v Council of the Borough of Birmingham (1858) 4 K & J 528, 70 ER 220 (Ch) at 225-226. 224......
  • Superboom Projects Sdn Bhd v Yap Seng Loong
    • Malaysia
    • Syariah Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
8 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • 18 November 2023
    ...449, 47 DLR (4th) 641, 25 OAC 29 (CA) ............................................................. 572 Halsey v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd, [1961] 1 WLR 683 .........................................621 Hamilton (City) v Loucks (2003), 232 DLR (4th) 362, [2003] OTC 848, [2003] OJ No 3669 (SCJ) .......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Equitable Remedies. Second Edition
    • 18 June 2013
    ...47 D.L.R. (4th) 641, 25 O.A.C. 29 (C.A.) ..................................................... 415 Halsey v. Esso Petroleum Co. Ltd., [1961] 1 W.L.R. 683 ................................... 453 Hamilton (City) v. Loucks (2003), 232 D.L.R. (4th) 362, [2003] O.T.C. 848, [2003] O.J. No. 3669 (......
  • WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN SINGAPORE: THE LEGAL CHALLENGE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1999, December 1999
    • 1 December 1999
    ...DLR (4th) 300. This was doubted by Lords Goff, Lloyd and Hoffmann in Hunter v Canary Wharf, supra n 100. 111 Halsey v Esso Petroleum Co [1961] 1 WLR 683 at 702—03 (noise and smell from oil distributing depot); Bone v Seale[1975] 1 WLR 797 (CA) (persistent smells emanating from pig farm); Bu......
  • Far Beyond ‘The Early Morning Crowing of a Farmyard Cock’: Revisiting the Place of Nuisance within Legal and Political Discourse
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Social & Legal Studies No. 11-1, March 2002
    • 1 March 2002
    ...[1872] 8 Ch App 8Gillingham BC v Medway (Chatham) Dock Co. Ltd [1992] 3 All ER 923Goldman v Hargreave [1966] 2 All ER 989Halsey v Esso [1961] 2 All ER 145Hannam v Mockett [1824] 2 B. & C. 934Holbeck Hall Hotel v Scarborough BC [2000] 12 LS Gaz. R 36 (CA)Hollywood Silver Fox Farm Ltd v Emmet......
  • Get Started for Free