Hambro v Burnand
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1904 |
| Year | 1904 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
Reckitt v Barnett, Pembroke and Slater
...debts or in the conduct of his business. 11My Lords, reliance was placed before your Lordships on the case of ( Hambro v. Burnand 1904, 2 K.B., page 10). In my judgment that case is plainly distinguishable. In that case Mr. Burnand had been given a Power of Attorney to enable him to underw......
-
Feasey v Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada and Another; Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Ltd v Feasey
...the agent acts in his capacity as an agent (as Centaur did), and that he acts within his authority (as Centaur did). Mr Flaux relies on Hambro v Burnand [1904] 2 KB 10, 26: "It is enough for us to say that it appears to be well settled in English law that the liability of a principal on a c......
-
Feasey v Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
...3 TR 693; 100 ER 808. Griffiths v FlemingELR [1909] 1 KB 805. Halford v KymerENR (1830) 10 B & C 724; 109 ER 619. Hambro v BurnandELR [1904] 2 KB 10. Harse v Pearl Life Assurance CoELR [1903] 2 KB 92 (KBD). Hebdon v WestENR (1863) 3 B & S 579; 122 ER 218. Hopewell Project Management Ltd v E......
-
The Hongkong Chinese Bank, Ltd. v Onlink Investments Ltd. And Others
...the agent; such persons are not bound to inquire into facts aliunde. The apparent authority is the real authority." In Hambro v. Burnand [1904] 2 KB 10 at 20, Collins MR observed "... where a written authority given to an agent covers the thing done by him on behalf of his principal, no inq......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
THE FINE ART OF FRAUD.
...40, at 7-029). (94) Oppenheimer v. Frazer and Wyatt [1907] 2 K.B. 50 at 62; Bridge, above, note 40, at 7-045. (95) Hambro v. Burnand [1904] 2 K.B. 10 at 20; Dobell, Beckett & Co. v. Nelson (1904) 7 F. 281 at 288; Bridge, above, note 40, at (96) The doctrine of constructive notice does n......