Hampden v Walsh
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1875 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
- G Balan Govindasamy v Lee Moi Moi and Others and Another Appeal
-
Sorrell v Finch
...entitled to the return of his deposit, he must sue the estate agent or solicitor for it; See Eltham v. Kingsman (1818) 1 B. & Ald. 683; Hampden v. Walsh [1876] 1 Q.B.D. 189. He cannot sue the vendor, because the vendor has never received it, or become entitled to receive it." The Master of ......
-
Burt v Claude Cousins & Company Ltd
...become entitled to the return of his deposit, he must sue the estate agent or solicitor for its see Eltham v. Kingsman. 1 B. & Ad. 683; Hampden v. Walsh (1876) 1 Q. B. D. 189. He cannot sue the vendor; because the vendor has never received it, or become entitled to receive it. 21 4. WHEN NO......
-
Thomson Hill Pte Ltd v Chang Erh and Another and Another Appeal
...the return of his deposit, he must sue the estate agent or solicitor for it; see Eltham v Kingsman (1818) 1 B & Ald 683; Hampden v Walsh (1876) 1 QBD 189. He cannot sue the vendor, because the vendor has never received it, or become entitled to receive This statement of the law appears to h......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Restitution
...the stakeholder before the stakeholder has paid over the deposit in accordance with instructions given by the parties: Hampden v Walsh(1876) 1 QBD 189. 19.99 Secondly, the judicial discretion to divide the deposit held by the stakeholder appears to be unprecedented under Singapore law. No a......