Hampton v Minns
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2001 |
| Year | 2001 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
- Sutherland Professional Funding Ltd v Bakewells and Others Chartis Insurance (UK) Ltd (Third Party Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc)
-
McGuinness v Norwich and Peterborough Building Society
...and Hope v. Premierpace had been relied upon, as a means of defending a petition or setting aside a statutory demand. Nonetheless, in Hampton v. Minns [2002] 1 WLR 1, it fell to Kevin Garnett QC sitting as a Deputy High Court judge to decide whether the guarantee in that case gave rise to a......
-
Arag Plc v Leighton Jones
...to a debt; it was not in the nature of a remedy for a wrong. An action for a debt is not within the scope of section 1 of the 1978 Act: Hampton v Minns [2002] 1 WLR 1. I agree with all of 15 In his skeleton argument, though not in oral submissions, Mr Newington-Bridges attempted to establi......
-
Sutherland Professional Funding Ltd v Bakewells (A Firm)and Others (Defendants and Part 20 Claimants) Chartis Insurance (UK) Ltd (Third Party) Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc (Fourth Party)
...to pay a liquidated sum in the event of a default by the client. In this regard, I was referred to decision of Mr Kevin Garnett QC in Hampton v Minns [2002] 1 WLR 1. The head note summarised the Deputy Judge's primary finding in the following terms: "…that, although a contract of guarantee ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Choice, Privacy and Publicly Funded Legal Advice at Police Stations
...in view of the fact that theappellant’s request to communicate with his solicitor by telephone was accepted, it168 Millar vD ickson [2002] 1 WLR 1615 at [31], [54].169 MS vSweden (1999) 28 EHRR 313 at [38], [31]^[32].170 R.Clayton and H. Tomlinson,The Law of Human Rights vol 1 (Oxford: OUP,......
-
Guilt and Innocence in the Criminal Justice System: A Comment on R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...wish to thank our colleague Mike Redmayne for his comments on anearlier draft of this case note.1 [2005] 1 AC1 (HL); [2003] QB 993 (CA); [2002] 1WLR 1857(QBD).2RvMullen [2000] QB 520Guilt and Innocence i n the Criminal Justice System80 rThe Modern LawReview Limited amounted to ‘degradation’......