Hancock v Watson

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Year1902
CourtHouse of Lords
Date1902
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
46 cases
  • Duncan v Equity Trustees Executors and Agency Company Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Macnamara, Re; Coe v Beale
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 10 June 1943
    ...2 P. Wms. 368, and Brown v. Burdett, 21 Ch. D. 667; nor could the gift be supported on the principle laid down inHancock v. Watson, [1902] A. C. 14, where an absolute gift was held to take effect as the trust imposed on it failed. Cur. adv. vult. Gavan Duffy J.:— I hold that the gift of the......
  • Rogers v Rogers
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Re Burton's Settlement Trusts. Public Trustee v Montefiore
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 26 January 1955
    ...Orford, Cunliffe, Greg & Co. (Manchester), appeared for the Respondent (Plaintiff). the MASTER of the ROLLS 1 In the well-known case of Hancock v. Watson, reported in 1902 Appeal Cases, pegs 14, it was clearlylaid down in the words of Lord Davey at page 22: "If the terms of the gift are amb......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • New World Order For Trusts?: The Meaning Of 'Prior Interest' In Section 32 (Video)
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 26 June 2021
    ...Corporation v Glenn [2021] EWHC 624 (Ch) Master Clark had to consider how that last restriction applied to a trust in Hancock v Watson [1902] AC 14 form, that is to say a trust where there there is an absolute gift to a beneficiary in the first instance and trusts are engrafted or imposed o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT