Hanoman v Southwark London Borough Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] EWHC 2039 (Ch) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Date | 2004 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Hanoman v Southwark London Borough Council
...not initially accept that Mr Hanoman had duly exercised his right to buy and that dispute led to litigation, in which Peter Smith J ( [2005] 1 All ER 795) on appeal from the Central London County Court held that his notice was valid and that Southwark was under a duty to deal with the appl......
-
R (G) v London Borough of Southwark
...application to exercise his right-to-buy was still subsisting and that the Council was under a duty to deal with it: Hanoman v Southwark London Borough Council [2004] EWHC 2039 (Ch), [2005] 1 All ER 795. In the meantime the statutory provisions for dealing with delay had been invoked. I m......
-
Martin v Medina Housing Association Ltd
...on appeal from circuit judges in right to buy cases under Part V of the Act, namely the decisions of Peter Smith J. in Hanoman v. Southwark London Borough Council [2005] 1 ALL ER 795 and of Nelson J. in Copping v. Surrey County Council [2005] 34 E.G. 110. 7 In the Hanoman case the tenant se......
-
Francis v Mayor & Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark
...the duty is to state their opinion. That has to be done in a relatively short time. As Peter Smith J said in Hanoman v LB Southwark [2004] EWHC 2039 (Ch): "17.… The wording of s. 124(1) could not, in my mind be plainer: they shall give a decision which is either in favour of accepting or de......
Request a trial to view additional results