Hardman v Amin

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date2000
Year2000
Date2000
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Groom v Selby
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Groom v Selby
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 October 2001
    ...connection between the negligence and the disability. In cases such as Rand v East Dorset Health Authority [2000] Lloyd's Rep Med 181, Hardman v Amin [2000] Lloyd's Rep Med 498, or Lee v Taunton & Somerset NHS Trust [2001] 1 FLR 419, there has been a negligent failure to diagnose the disord......
  • Ms Omodele Meadows v Dr Hafshah Khan
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 23 November 2017
    ...not provide the final answer. 13 The first reported case following McFarlane to which I was referred was the decision of Henriques J in Hardman v Amin [2001] P.N.L.R. 11, in which it was said: " McFarlane does not affect the law so far as it relates to the wrongful birth of disabled childre......
  • Nouri v Australian Capital Territory
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 28 September 2018
    ...181 the parent of a disabled child was awarded damages reflecting the costs of raising the child until the age of 25. In Hardman v Amin [2001] PNLR 11 the damages extended to the lifespan of the claimant's parent. See also Gaynor N v Warrington Health Authority [2003] Lloyds Rep Med 365 at......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT