Harris (Ipswich) Ltd v Harrison

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Date1978
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 cases
  • North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust v Dr Andrew Gregg
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 March 2019
    ...45 What the employer can do when an employee is accused of a criminal offence was considered in Harris (Ipswich) Limited v Harrison [1978] I.C.R. 1256. Giving the judgment of the EAT, Philips J said: “…What needs to be discussed is not so much the alleged offence as the action which the emp......
  • AA v Medical Council
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 11 October 2001
    ...ACT 1988 (UK) OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON ACT 1861 S44 OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON ACT 1861 S45 HARRIS (IPSWICH) LTD V HARRISON 1978 1 ICR 1256 R V BBC, EX PARTE LAVELLE 1983 1 WLR 23 GRANT V GARDA SIOCHANA COMPLAINTS BOARD UNREP MURPHY 12.6.1996 1996/11/3617 PHILIPS V MEDICAL COUNCIL 1991......
  • Andrew Gregg v North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 27 February 2018
    ...of the position. ( Waller LJ at [532]) 114 Mr Sutton also referred the Court to a decision by the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Harris (Ipswich) Ltd v Harrison [1978] ICR 1256, in which Philips J held that We do not accept this criticism of Carr v. Alexander Russell Ltd , which seems to us ......
  • Miss A Dawson v Mr C Malpass: 1303609/2019
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 3 August 2021
    ...an uplift in relation to any breach. 56. Mr Thakerar on behalf of the claimant directs me to the cases of Harris (Ipswich) Ltd v Harrison 1978 ICR 1256, EAT and A v B EAT 1167/01 and says that the more serious the impact of the decision the higher the duty for the respondent to satisfy itse......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • DEALING WITH EMPLOYEE CRIMES
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2009, December 2009
    • 1 December 2009
    ...v Port Authority of Singapore[1976] 1 MLJ 210 and Telekom Malaysia Kawasan Utara v Krishnan Kutty a/l Sanguni Nair[2002] 3 AMR 2898. 55 [1978] ICR 1256 at 1259. 56 What would be a reasonable period, it is suggested, would depend on the factors such as the nature of the employer’s business, ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT