Harris v Beauchamp Brothers
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1893 |
| Year | 1893 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 cases
-
TMSF v Merrill Lynch
...P.O. Workers, [1977] 3 All E.R. 70, referred to. (15) Grassa, In re(2007), 363 B.R. 650, referred to. (16) Harris v. Beauchamp Bros., [1894] 1 Q.B. 801, not followed. (17) Holmes v. Coghill(1802), 7 Ves. Jr. 499; 32 E.R. 201, referred to. (18) Holmes v. Millage, [1893] 1 Q.B. 551, not follo......
-
Mephistopheles Debt Collection Service (A Firm) v Lotay
...paragraph (c) of section 42(1A). The judge had relied mainly on the decision of the Court of Appeal inHarris v Beauchamp BrothersELR ((1893) 2 QB 534) which showed that judgment could be obtained against partners sued in their firm name notwithstanding that one of the partners was a minor. ......
-
ACC Loan Management Ltd v Rickard
...ratio of the case, and as a historical exposition is too narrowly stated. As Davey L.J. pointed out in Harris v. Beauchamp Brothers [1894] 1 Q.B. 801, 808, the most common case for the appointment of a receiver by way of equitable execution before the Judicature Acts was that described by ......
-
ACC Loan Management v Rickard
...Act, 1873, s.25(8). Lawrence Collins L.J. considered Edwards & Co. v. Picard [1909] 2 KB 903; Harris v. Beauchamp Brothers [1894] 1 Q.B. 801, 809/810 (CA); Morgan v. Harte [1914] 2 KB 183, 189 CA; MacLaine Watson & Co. v. International Tin Council [1988] Ch. 1 (affirmed) [1989] Ch. 253......
Request a trial to view additional results