Harrods Ltd v Harrodian School Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1996 |
| Year | 1996 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
326 cases
-
Robyn Rihanna Fenty and Others v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (t/a Topshop) and Another
...referred me to the words of Jacob J (as he then was) in Hodgkinson v Wards Mobility [1995] FSR 169 and of the Court of Appeal in Harrods v Harrodian School [1996] RPC 697 about the significance of deception in passing off. Jacob J emphasised that the tort of passing off has never shown even......
- J Sainsbury Plc v Active: 4Life Ltd
-
McDonald's Corp v Future Enterprises Pte Ltd
...class 42 in respect of “restaurant and catering services”. As so pithily put by Millett LJ in Harrods Limited v Harrodian School Limited [1996] RPC 697 (“Harrodian School”) at 712, “to be known to everyone is not to be known for 55 Here we would refer to two Canadian cases. First is McDonal......
-
Robert Perkins and Keith Thomas Shone and Retriever Sports Ltd and Thomas Pope
...formulation in the speech of Lord Oliver in the Jif Lemon case, Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc. [1990] RPC 341 at 406. In the Harrodian case (which I will consider in a little detail later – see paragraphs 43 to 46 below) Millett LJ encapsulated the formulation by saying that Lo......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
The Intersection between Registered and Unregistered Trade Marks
...Telecommunications Plc v One in a Million Ltd [1998] 4 All ER 476, 496-7 (Aldous LJ); Harrods Ltd v Harrodian School Ltd [1996] RPC 697, 715–16 (Millett LJ); see further Hazel Carty, 'Dilution and Passing Off: A Cause for Concern' (1996) 112 Law Quarterly Review 632. Adding to the uncertain......
-
Residual Goodwill — A case of discontinued marks: Beiersdorf AG v Koni Multinational Brands (Pty) Ltd
...SA [1999] 3 CMLR 427, [2000] RPC572, [1999] All ER (D) 1007 (European Court of Justice) para 23. See also Harrods Ltd vHarrodian School [1996] RPC 697 (CA) 712, where counsel had argued: ‘In this case the beliefengendered [in the minds of the public] is probably that Harrods sponsor or back......
-
A critique of legal measures of brand confusion
...or that someone other thanthe actual producer has assumed responsibility for the quality of the goods(Harrods Ltd v. Harrodian School Ltd [1996] RPC 697). However, even ifconfusion can be shown, compensation will not automatically followbecause the court needs to be convinced that the manuf......
-
Intellectual Property Law
...that the applicant”s business is connected with the opponent”s. For this principle, Ang J cited Harrods Limited v Harrodian School Limited[1996] RPC 697, a case on passing off, as authority: see also CDL Hotels International Ltd v Pontiac Marina Pte Ltd[1998] 2 SLR 550 at [63]—[66]. Ang J f......