Harrods Ltd v Tester
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1937 |
| Year | 1937 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Deutsche Schachtbau-und Tiefbohrgesellschaft m.b.H. v R'as al-Khaimah National Oil Company
...Johnson relied on a number of authorities in support of this argument, starting with Roberts v. D'earth (1881) 8 QBD and ending with Harrods, Ltd. v. Tester (1937) 2 All E.R. 236. In the latter case Scott L.J. said at page 7"'Indebted', in that rule, means indebted in the sense not simply ......
-
Deutsche Schachtbau-und Tiefbohrgesellschaft m.b.H. v R'as al-Khaimah National Oil Company
...that some support for Sitco's argument was to be derived from Hirsch v. Coates (1856) 18 C.B. 757, 764, per Willes J., and from Harrods Ltd. v. Tester [1937] 2 All E.R. 236, 242, per Scott L.J. Nevertheless, having regard to the terms of Order 47, r. 1, he concluded that all that was requi......
-
Teo Siew Har v Lee Kuan Yew
...depend on the facts and circumstances of the case. We do not think one can distill such a rule from the cases. In Harrods Ltd v Tester [1937] 2 All ER 236 a husband opened a banking account in the sole name of the wife. The wife gave a mandate authorising the husband to draw on the account.......
-
Banque Indosuez v Madam Sumilan Awal also known as Aw Kim Lan and Others
...was opened merely for convenience. The same conclusion was reached in McLean v Vessey [1935] 4 DLR 170 and Harrods, Ltd v Tester [1937] 2 All ER 236, both cases in which Marshall was followed; in Harrods, for instance, the wife had again used the account to pay for household expenses. 74. I......
Request a trial to view additional results