Harrop v Harrop
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1920 |
| Date | 1920 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
- Chang Kiam Ho; Muttiah
-
George v AVA Trade (EU) Ltd
...a change in the circumstances of the parties. At pp. 300-301, he said:- ‘I cannot with respect, agree with the conclusions reached in Harrop v. Harrop [1920] 3 KB 386 and in re. McCartney [1921] 1 Ch. 522 that, because a foreign maintenance order may subsequently be varied if circumstance......
-
Cartwright v Cartwright
...maintenance order which was variable could not be enforced in England because it was not final and conclusive: see Harrop v HarropELR([1920] 3 KB 386). It therefore constituted a debt which was not provable by virtue of a "rule of law" within the meaning of rule 12.3(3) of the 1986 Rules. T......
-
McC (M) v McC (J)
...MATRIMONIAL CAUSES ACT 1973 (UK) S13 CLARKE V JONES (INSPECTOR OF TAXES) 1985 3 WLR 749 NOUVION V FREEMAN 1890 25 AC 1 HARROP V HARROP 1920 3 KB 386 MACARTNEY, IN RE 1921 1 CH 522 BEATTY V BEATTY 1924 1 KB 807 NUNN V NUNN 8 LR IR 298 KEYS V KEYS 1919 2 IR 160 MCDONNELL V MCDONNELL 1921 ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Cases referred to in 1983
...of 7/3/64. 399 Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918) 247 U.S. at 275-276 184 Hanson v. Ratcliffe U.D.C. (1922) Ch. 49. 495 Harrop v. Harrop (1920) 3 K.B. 386 136 Henderson v. Henderson (1843) 67 E.R. 313 at 319. 44 Hill v. Williams Hill Parklane Ltd. (1949) A.C. 530 at 546 228 Hoke v. United States 22......