Harvey v Sir G. Reynold
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1662 |
| Date | 01 January 1662 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 345
King's Bench Division
harvey versus sir G. reynold. T. 2 car. rot. 1179. Debt sur un escape. Le plaintiff declare come il ad un judgement vers J. B. pur 6001. en Londres, & tiel jour & an ad imprison luy tanc^ fuit remove p habeas corpus, devant le Chief Justice, & commit en execution la, & remain la lou le dit Sir G. Reynold, fuit guardian, &c. quel voluntariment permit luy d'escaper. Defendant plead en barre, confeasant le dit J. B. destre en execution prout, &c. Mes q^ le dit J. B. devant le action port enfreint le prison, & escape encounter le volunt del defend, sur que il fait fresh suit de vill in vill, & de county in county, tanq^ il reprise luy sur le fresh suit; et alleadge le reprisel destre ante le exhibition del bill, (viz.) le 8 jour del May quel en verity fuit puis un imparlance, mes devant plea plead. Le primer question fuit, si le reprisel sur fresh suit sur negligent escape avant plea plead penrlont 1'action, fuit bieri 1 Doderidge & Whitlock, que nemv, sur lea authorities, 34 E. 3. 1. F. Det. 162. 13 E. 4. 9. 3 Rep. Rigeway's case, F. Barre, 253. 3 E. 6. Bract Escape 43. 45. Isaint en vast, reparation avant breve est un bone plea, mea nemy pendont c Jones accord, quia le portont 1'action est un loyal chose, & charge, 6 le escape eat un tort; & n'est reason, c^ apres il ad loyal cause del suit il c deferra 7 ans pur doubt de reprisel p le goalor, & que il paya costs sur reprisel esteant barre del action. TJncore en ascun choses happont pendont le suit, serra plead en barre. Come en Wrot & Wicfs case, 4 Rep. 45. 47. Conviction pendont appeal plead en barre de c 3 Rep. 90. Purslow's case, pendont le formedon proclamation passe, serra barre. Et 1'opinion del tout Court aur c poynt fuit ove plaintiff. Secondement, le plaintiff plead le reprisel avant le exhibition del bill, (viz.) 8 May, 10 Jac. quol en verity fuit puis le bill, si ceo (viz.) soit void. Doderidge, quand un (viz.) est contrary a ceo que est alleadge avant est voyd voyd. Jones, le (viz.) icy vitiat le plea; quia le plea est male si jour del reprisel ne soit monstre, quia le temps est ma-[201]-terial, quia, si avant le bill est ove defendant. Mes lou n'est material chose, que vient desouth le (viz.) la, si soit contra le matter avant. Le (viz.) est voyd. Come H. 43 Eliz. Drake & Young, action sur un trover, & il monstre, que fuit possesse, & postea perde, & ils vient al rnaines del defendant; que postea (viz.)...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Cutler and Others v Southern and Others
...133, Gewen v. Boll. Hob. 14, Noi'ton v. Simmes. Ibid. 199, Brickliead v. Archbishop of York. (8) Accord. Cro. Jac. 428, Tesmond v. Johnson. Latch, 200, 201, Harvey v. Reynold. Ibid. 209, Alcock v. Blofield. Hard. 4, Jones v. Williams. Postea 169, Sinner v. Andrews. 2 Saund. 291, Dakin's cas......
-
Dakin's Case
...supported by a great number of other authorities. Cro. Jac. 135, Osbourn v. Ruler. Ibid. 154, Brigate v. Short. Ibid. 662, Rutter v. Mills. Latch, 200, 201, Harvey v. Reynolds. Ibid. 209, Alcock v. Blofield. All. 23, Sims v. Gregory. 2 Str. 1092, Webb v. Turner. 12 Mod. 579, Johnson v. Meet......
-
Mary Gale, Executrix of John Ware, against Lewis
...J.) : and, as to the immateriality of averments made in a too early stage of the pleadings, Sir Ralph Sony's case (n), Harvey v. Reynold (Latch, 200), Com. Dig. Pleader (G, 12), Hyde v. Watts (12 M. & W. 254), Winch v. Keeley (I T. R. 619). Cur. adv. vult. Lord Denman C.J., in Hilary vacati......
-
Jones v Pope
...pleaded ; nor shall any special plea be allowed without an oath by the defendant, that the prisoner escaped without his knowledge; Latch, 200, 201, Harvey v. Sir G. Reynold. 1 Vent. 211, 217, Sir Ralph Bovy's case. 2 Term Rep. 126, Bonafous v. Walker; notwithstanding it seems to be holden i......