Hasan v Willson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1977 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Dextra Bank & Trust Company Ltd v Bank of Jamaica
...provided the BOJ had no notice of that fraud: Clutton v George Attenborough & Son [1897] AC 90; Talbot v Von Boris [1911] 1 KB 854; Hasan v Willson [1977] 1 Lloyd's Rep 431. 23 Thus Dextra rested its conversion claim on a single point, the engagement by Phillips of Beckford to effect physic......
-
Lomax Leisure Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Miller and another
...cheque and not some third-party—see Chalmers and Guest on Bills of Exchange, 16 th edn (2005) at paragraph 4–023 referring to cases such Hasan v. Willson [1977] 1 Lloyd's Rep 431 and MK International Development Co Ltd v. Housing Bank [1991] 1 Bank LR 74. However, Mr Collings QC, in respons......
-
Malilang and Others v MV Houda Pearl
...Das v Vallippa Chettiar (NKV) s/o Nagappa Chettiar [1954] 1 WLR 380 (PC); J Talbot v Von Boris [1911] 1 KB 854; Hassan v Willson [1977] 1 Lloyds Rep 431; and there is a cross-reference 1986 (2) SA p731 Corbett JA to para 515 (which deals with undue influence by third A parties). Kesarmal's ......
-
MK International Development Company Ltd (Plaintiffs)Respondents) v The Housing Bank (Defendants)Appellants)
...cheque would be forthcoming. There are however two aspects of the case which must be mentioned. First, it seems to have been argued in Hasan v. Willson [1977] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 431 that some observations of Lord Justice Danckwerts in Diamond v. Graham were to the effect that the antecedent deb......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Banking Law
...party. In addition, consideration must move from the payee to the drawer and not from a third party. Similarly, in Hasan v WillsonUNK[1977] 1 Lloyd's Rep 431, Goff J decided that it was a fundamental principle of contract law that the consideration to support a contract must move from a pro......
-
CONSIDERATION FOR A BILL OF EXCHANGE — AN OLD ISSUE RECONSIDERED
...p. 497. Diamond v. Graham[1968] 1 W.L.R. 1061 is not directly in point as it concerned the construction of s. 27 (2); see infra. 8. [1977] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 431, at pp. 440—441; contrast, though, Walsh, Spriggs, Nolan and Finney v. Hoag & Bosh Pty. Ltd.(1976) 12 A.L.R. 411 (Aust.); and see Gev......