Hasan v Willson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1977
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 cases
  • Dextra Bank & Trust Company Ltd v Bank of Jamaica
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • November 26, 2001
    ...provided the BOJ had no notice of that fraud: Clutton v George Attenborough & Son [1897] AC 90; Talbot v Von Boris [1911] 1 KB 854; Hasan v Willson [1977] 1 Lloyd's Rep 431. 23 Thus Dextra rested its conversion claim on a single point, the engagement by Phillips of Beckford to effect physic......
  • Lomax Leisure Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Miller and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...cheque and not some third-party—see Chalmers and Guest on Bills of Exchange, 16 th edn (2005) at paragraph 4–023 referring to cases such Hasan v. Willson [1977] 1 Lloyd's Rep 431 and MK International Development Co Ltd v. Housing Bank [1991] 1 Bank LR 74. However, Mr Collings QC, in respons......
  • Malilang and Others v MV Houda Pearl
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Das v Vallippa Chettiar (NKV) s/o Nagappa Chettiar [1954] 1 WLR 380 (PC); J Talbot v Von Boris [1911] 1 KB 854; Hassan v Willson [1977] 1 Lloyds Rep 431; and there is a cross-reference 1986 (2) SA p731 Corbett JA to para 515 (which deals with undue influence by third A parties). Kesarmal's ......
  • MK International Development Company Ltd (Plaintiffs)Respondents) v The Housing Bank (Defendants)Appellants)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • December 21, 1990
    ...cheque would be forthcoming. There are however two aspects of the case which must be mentioned. First, it seems to have been argued in Hasan v. Willson [1977] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 431 that some observations of Lord Justice Danckwerts in Diamond v. Graham were to the effect that the antecedent deb......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Banking Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2011, December 2011
    • December 1, 2011
    ...party. In addition, consideration must move from the payee to the drawer and not from a third party. Similarly, in Hasan v WillsonUNK[1977] 1 Lloyd's Rep 431, Goff J decided that it was a fundamental principle of contract law that the consideration to support a contract must move from a pro......
  • CONSIDERATION FOR A BILL OF EXCHANGE — AN OLD ISSUE RECONSIDERED
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1991, December 1991
    • December 1, 1991
    ...p. 497. Diamond v. Graham[1968] 1 W.L.R. 1061 is not directly in point as it concerned the construction of s. 27 (2); see infra. 8. [1977] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 431, at pp. 440—441; contrast, though, Walsh, Spriggs, Nolan and Finney v. Hoag & Bosh Pty. Ltd.(1976) 12 A.L.R. 411 (Aust.); and see Gev......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT