Hawkins v Price
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1947 |
| Year | 1947 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
25 cases
-
Loh Chin Kok and Another v Lee Teck Seng Paul
... ... plaintiffs of a freehold property known as unit 8-J ICB Shopping Centre, Yio Chu Kang Road, Singapore 1954 (the defendant`s property) at a price of $180,000. Alternatively and in addition to the claim for specific performance, the first and second plaintiffs claim damages for alleged breach of ... That being the case, the omission of the completion date ought not to preclude the first plaintiff from bringing this action: see Hawkins v Price [1947] Ch D 645. But even if it is said that the December 1993 completion date was not solely for the first plaintiff`s benefit, so that it ... ...
-
Mulhall v Haren
...purpose of the Statute. It is clear that the writing must contain all the materia terms of the oral agreement: see Hawkins .v. Price( (1947) Ch. 645); Tiverton Estates Ltd. .v. Wearwell Ltd. at p. 161 per Lord Denning. In this case, the letter from the defendant's solicitors dated the 15th......
-
Tiverton Estates Ltd v Wearwell Ltd
...12% per annum". Those seem to me to be material terms which, being omitted from the note be memorandum, are fatal to its validity, see Hawkins v. Price (1947) Ch. 645. 49 In some circumstances it would not be right to vacate the Caution. For instance, if the cautioner had a substantial poin......
-
Timmins v Moreland Street Property Company Ltd
...term is a matter of any substance, may vitiate the memorandum, as in Johnson v. Humphrey, 1946 1 All England Reports, page 460, and Hawkins v. Price, 1947 Chancery, page 645. 32 I cannot accept this view. The question here is whether the memorandum relied upon by the Plaintiff sufficiently ......
Get Started for Free