Hayes v Dowding

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1996
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Farm Assist Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment Food & Rural Affairs
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 12 December 2008
    ...courts now regard to be the scope of waiver of privilege, the reasoning in Hearn v. Rhaycertainly does not represent English Law.” Hayes v. Dowding 22 In Hayes v. Dowding [1996] PNLR 578 there were disputes over the running of a private company which were compromised by the plaintiffs' so......
  • Paragon Finance Plc (formerly National Home Loans Corpn Plc) v Freshfields (A Firm)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 March 1999
    ...as these, be prepared to disclose relevant material." 10 Then, after referring to a passage in the judgment of Parker J in Hayes and Another v Dowding and Others [1996] PNLR 578 at 591B, Buckley J continued: "Neither that passage, in context, nor what I have said above, undermines, nor is i......
  • Dse (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Intertan Inc.
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Sir Owen George Glenn Knzm Onzm and Another v Eric John Watson and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 16 December 2016
    ...the public domain. 20 In support of that submission, she pointed to the fact that in Paragon the Court of Appeal overruled a case called Hayes v Dowding [1996] PNLR 578 as not representing the law in this country, as follows (at 1193F-H): "We need not linger on Hayes v Dowding [1996] PNLR 5......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Generalised Rules of Fairness in Evidence Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 63-1, January 2000
    • 1 January 2000
    ...and mitigation ofloss. Put another way, Freshfields argued that this item of Paragon’s claim resulted28 [1996] 1 WLR 358 at 370 (QBD).29 [1996] PNLR 578 at 589D-E (Ch. D).30 [1993] 1 All ER 724 (CA).31 Hayes vDowding [1996] PNLR at 594A.32 Lillicrap vNalder & Son (a firm) [1993] 1 All ER 72......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT