Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1990 |
| Year | 1990 |
| Date | 1990 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others
...is given on an appeal against a decision of the Queen's Bench Divisional Court (Woolf L.J. and French J.) given on 1st November 1989: [1990] 2 W.L.R. 17. On the application of Mr Hazell ("the Auditor") under section 19(1) of the Local Government Finance Act 1982, the Divisional Court made ......
-
Patricia Stubbs (on behalf of Green Lanes Environmental Action Movement) v Lake District National Park Authority
...of section 122 of the 1984 Act. In support of this submission she relies upon the authority of Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [1990] 2 WLR 17. This case concerned the entering into of transactions by a local authority, the detail of which it is unnecessary to rehearse for present purp......
-
ABC Ltd (First Appellant) X Ltd & Y Ltd (Second and Third Appellants) v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
...do things incidental to statutory functions must be construed in the context of the statute as a whole: see Lord Templeman in Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [1992] 2 AC 1 at 31D to E. Although the Scheme is found in a different statute that does not diminish the need to construe sectio......
-
Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council and Others
...or may on investigation prove to have been lawful. All the transactions were held by the Divisional Court (Woolf L.J. and French J. [1990] 2 W.L.R. 17) to be unlawful. The Court of Appeal (Sir Stephen Brown P., Nicholls and Bingham L.JJ. [1990] 2 W.L.R. 1038) held that some of the transac......
Request a trial to view additional results