Hegarty v O'Sullivan
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1985 |
| Year | 1985 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Linnett v Coles
...(No. 2) (1985) 135 N.L.J. 556) or under the general powers of this court, R.S.C. Order 59 Rule 10(3) (see Hegarty v. O'Sullivan (1985) 135 N.L.J. 557). 7 Mr. Laws, however, did invite our attention to section 13 of the 1960 Act. He submitted that the effect of that section was to give appel......
-
M v P (Contempt of Court: Committal Order) ; Butler v Butler
...stand." Farquharson, LJ at p 644B said this: "Are these defects fatal to the lawfulness of the committal? In Hegarty v. O'Sullivan (1985) 135 N.L.J. 557 it was observed by this court that, as a matter of practice, the requirements of service of a copy of the court's order upon the contemnor......
-
B. v B. (Contempt Committal)
...the requirements of natural justice demand that the provisions of this rule must be obeyed strictly: see Hegarty v. O'Sullivan [1985] 135 New L.J. 557 per Kerr L.J. at page 558: "It seems to me that the rules, as has been stated again and again, clearly require that the order drawn up in re......
-
Smith v Smith (Contempt: Committal)
...different where the contemnor had already been reduced to custody. That appears most clearly, I think, from Hegarty v. O'Sullivan (1985) 135 NLJ 557, the report of which immediately follows that of the Hill Samuel case, having been decided some four weeks later. Lord Justice Kerr, who was a......
Request a trial to view additional results